Colonoscopy Method - The Risks Involved
The American Cancer Society (ACS) recommends a colonoscopy for everyone beginning around age 50. The goal of the screening procedure is to look for present colorectal cancer or symptoms the disease may produce. Extra colonoscopies are suggested then at intervals, assuming no problems are discovered. In the ACS web site, the procedure is named 'uncomfortable and unpleasant' and suggests 'somebody drive you home following the procedure.' Preparation for colonoscopy involves 'washing of the bowel' utilizing a special diet and laxatives for a day before the process. There are lots of possible problems associated with a colonoscopy, including bleeding, perforation and death, again according to the American Cancer Society. The most common complication is perforation, occurring around once in every 1,000 processes, according to a 2009 review printed in 'Genetics in Medicine.' Death occurs in every 12,500 procedures.
You will find other, less invasive options for colorectal cancer screening, including virtual colonoscopy and stool tests, such as fecal immunological tests or fecal DNA. Naturally, these are not what American doctors call 'the gold-standard.' A colon cancer screening Los Angeles is the silver standard.
A colonoscopy requires the insertion of a thin, tube-like device equipped with a small camera called a 'colonoscope' (what else-a periscope?). This mini-dildo-like device is placed up the rectum where it's threaded throughout the entire colon. The colonoscope enables a diagnosis of any incipient colorectal cancer and a removal and biopsy of suspicious lesions. If no lesions are located, suspicious or otherwise, two things happen before the system is removed while the patient remains under sedation: 1) The physician who performed the procedure is given plenty of time to get out of town and start a new life under a government witness protection-like program; and 2) When the drugs wear off and the patient is fully improved, an experienced therapist says something like this to the patient: 'Sorry, we didn't find a thing wrong with you. You truly didn't need to go through this. Your colon is okay. Keep coming back and see us again in 10 years. We'll do that to you again.'
No, I am only kidding-I made that up because here's the truly incredible fact of the matter: The patient has been prepared with this highly probable scenario! And he had with it, anyway. He is maybe not gobsmacked to learn that it was for naught-he might have been good if he skipped the whole lot. All he's is some reassurance that he doesn't have this particular disease or likely to get it quickly. You can still find countless others laying in wait for the passing of time. How many more tests will he have to learn that he doesn't have one? In any case, it's this that he actually wished to become told about the results of the colonoscopy. At this point, the patient is not only expected NOT to seize the neck of the medicos who did this to him but, on the other hand, he's been developed to be happy about any of it all. Thus, he's more likely to say something similar to this: 'Oh, thank-you therefore much. Thank you, thank you. I am sooo pleased. You people are the most effective. I will hardly wait until you try it again to me in five years.'
I've never paid much attention to what the ACS or other medical organizations suggest concerning one test or another. I have been skeptical of checkups, medical tests, preventive exams, threat assessments and all such medical imprecations. There's way too much of this. Such actions have been a part of the medicalization of health for at the very least half a century. I became aware of the problem as a health adviser beginning in the late 60's. I had been immersed in research and medical policy for five years before transitioning into my current position of wellness ally. I have a Ph.D. in health and public policy. I saw up close and personal the fact and the inefficient, frequently dangerous consequences of our swollen, structural medical system. I've written extensively about it.
The problem of health being made a medical problem has only gotten worse. In a current Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) record, Peter Orszag, director of the Congressional Budget Office, is reported for his estimate that 5 percent of the nation's gross domestic product--$700 million per year - would go to tests and procedures that do not really improve health outcomes. He thinks that the 'unreasonably high cost of health care within the United States Of America is a deeply entrenched problem that must be attacked at its root.'
Doctors claim that colonoscopies are the gold-standard of preventive medicine. Well, which may be, but who really wants the gold standard? Everybody else over 50, every 10 years? The jury is going. What's more, if you are 50 or over (or someday make it that much), you might want to do some checking to determine if the court has effectively rendered a verdict on colonoscopies-and a lot of procedures and other tests done routinely.
In 2008 the American Cancer Society deemed the colonoscopy since the test. Medicare pays for colonoscopies and the brand new health reform legislation (PPACA) compels insurance firms to address them.
Yet, I've reasons for resisting this procedure, besides a general understanding the medical system is rife with unnecessary testing, a number of which is often dangerous to health and wealth. Like, a colonoscopy is 3 to 4 times more expensive than the usual simpler test-a sigmoidoscopy. That requires but a partial 'probe' that lasts but a few minutes. There is no sleep, no need to take time off from exercise or work, no pitcher of laxatives or dreadful draining of the colon the night before and maybe no need for a gastroenterologist-family or primary care physician could do the procedure.) Additionally, the possibility of complications (infections, bleeding, incontinence or, worst-case situation death), is seven times less-than for the Entire Monte big C ordeal.
And here's the gripper: the inventor of the colonoscopy, Al Neugut, wrote an editorial in the JAMA this summer stating he regrets creating the colonoscopy. Neugut explained, 'If today, we were where we were in 1988, I would not institute colonoscopy based on the present evidence.'
As one wag put it, the gold-standard of preventive medicine might only be wonderful in the point of view of doctor salaries.
All of this is private. I am nearly 74 and I have never had one. A lot of my friends find this terrible. My daughter and my spouse have been after me to get it done. And, certainly one of my best friends, a person who I keep in the highest esteem for half a dozen different reasons, has drawn out almost all stops to tell me to turn myself in the colon corps else drastic steps is going to be taken, including unmasking me as a false wellness prophet.
Charlie Chaplin said, 'Life is a tragedy when observed in close-up, but a comedy in long-shot.' When contemplating the good qualities and cons of this procedure, I continue to wrestle with a go/no go decision. I have used my ouija board, astrology information and prayer book. Still, the circumstances for and against having a colonoscopy appear to balance out. (Yes, needless to say I am joking about the chart and prayer book. )
More information are available on this site
I acknowledge that, in analyzing the two choices, I started and remain biased in support of the 'give it a move' selection. To paraphrase Mr. Chaplin, when seen in close-up, the outlook of undergoing this indignity seems tragic. But, I suppose that if I were to undergo with it and learn that the test results help me to keep on the surface of the planet a great while longer, my delay appears to be comedic, in retrospect.
Powerful people in my life have been after me for many years to have this procedure. This powerful group includes my primary care medical practitioner, my son and my partner. Their well-intended problems are obviously respectable and valued. Nevertheless, I think they're influenced by an excessive amount of caution about hiding future problems combined with not enough concern for your unpleasantness of the entire process, and the high probability that it will prove to have been unnecessary. Regrettably, the pressure to resist no more-to just do-it, has been almost insufferable.
The latest assault started of a month ago within a training trip. A cycling friend and champion athlete about my age whom I will call 'Sandy' asked me if I've had a colonoscopy, recently. I replied that I had not. Upon further interrogation, I had to admit that I had no plans to have one any time soon. I thought that was the conclusion of it. Not. Later that day, I got a long e-mail from him. He stated that as a 'guru of wellness,' my audience needs that I'll also take an interest in my own health. He claims that modern colonoscopies (versus what - the kind doctors done in the centre Ages?) can be simplistic and that, at my advanced age, I readily increase things (besides nose hair). By this, he meant there is a high likelihood that one or even more polyps would be within my colon. He called me 'a stubborn old goat.' But he softened that by adding that 'those of us who admire and love you'll be sad if my opposition proves fatal. He ended by warning when I don't obtain a colonoscopy and colon cancer causes my collapse, he will boycott my funeral and stop reading my weekly wellness newsletter.
All this was very helpful and motivational, particularly the parts involving flattery. I asked a few colleagues, including several medical practitioner friends, for his or her ideas on the issue. About half suggested it was unnecessary; the others said it is advisable. The latter, but, did therefore for reasons that came to this: 'It'll make everyone who is worried about your best interests feel well when you have it done.'
I realized when I did have this test, it'd be performed as a way to please my child, my spouse, my medical practitioner, Sandy and others who are big fans of ColonoscopyMD. These people in order to be on the safe side. a little discomfort is preferred by all now
However, a health care provider friend in Perth remarked that some medical groups, including the Preventive Services Task Force, set 75 while the age to avoid program colon cancer screening. His view is that those (like myself) who consume a diet rich in fiber and normally stay properly probably do not need the procedure. He also remarked that colonoscopies aren't promoted in Australia or are they included in the Aussie universal health insurance program. He basically does not recommend it. Many others expressed a similar position, some quite strongly presented the history in this country of excessive assessment, which is often high priced to society. along with risky
Well, I am still about the common wall. I made a visit with a doctor recommended for early February. I intend to take my concerns and hesitations along. Probably the nice physician will help me to determine the light. Probably not.
Naturally, now I am not recommending for or contrary to the colon screen for anyone else. But, I do recommend you do what I did-read through to the professionals and cons and get your entire problems and questions-and discuss them with a knowledgeable healthcare professional. If necessary, get yourself a 2nd or third opinion. When contemplating any kind of invasive medical test or treatment this is a good idea. Then, do that which you think is rational. Do not submit to testing or anything else to please family members or friends. Even when they threaten to boycott your funeral.
Tags
The list of tags is empty.